data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1fa5/e1fa52f8768235279bfd9952d6dcc97c0bf54fbe" alt=""
I don't know what to say, except perhaps- "It's not just me, right?" Huh, fashion as a phallic symbol. Maybe Giles is implying that women are being masculinized. Women are protecting themselves in male-dominated industries by imitating men. Only Giles would create fashion that requires a dissertation which is why he's the enfant terrible of British fashion. Here are some less controversial looks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2aca/b2aca2a703ce0b199f065a96793c157cd19c6c51" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c9f4/1c9f4fa6a3e1cbce4b18ec06ee256116a31371ea" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45c5b/45c5b666c419a8eb6c6bcf20ca492a6cdde7cc9e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/205c0/205c06933c379455e10b5435995c1b1af63bbb81" alt=""
Browsing the Giles collection is always fun because it blurs the line between fashion and art, ugly and pretty. I can only say that the clothes aren't very wearable but I can see the odd accessory being worn by a fashion editor. I loved the wide brimmed hat that resembles Japanese straw hats, the touches of fur, and the amazing, open-zipper, tall boots.
No comments:
Post a Comment